cli: promote --force on renew + require --reason on revoke (closes P3-1, P3-2)

Closes findings P3-1 and P3-2 from the 2026-05-05 CLI/API/MCP↔GUI parity
audit (cowork/cli-gui-parity-audit-2026-05-05/RESULTS.md). Both findings
flagged hidden defaults that the CLI was sending without exposing them
to operators: `force=false` baked into every renew payload, and a silent
fallback to `reason="unspecified"` whenever --reason was omitted.

P3-1 — promote --force on `certs renew` (full end-to-end plumbing)

The pre-2026-05-05 CLI sent `{"force": false}` in the renew body. The
API handler never decoded it — a textbook "lying field" per the
operator's CLAUDE.md "complete path, not the easy path" rule: the body
field stored a value, claimed to do something, and silently did nothing
because the wire never reached the consumer. Adding a --force flag that
also went unread would have created another lying field.

This commit takes the complete path:

  service.CertificateService.TriggerRenewal grew a `force bool` parameter
  (internal/service/certificate.go). When force=true, the
  RenewalInProgress block is overridden so operators can recover stuck
  in-flight renewals where a previous job hung without releasing the
  status flag. Archived and Expired remain terminal blockers regardless
  of force — those are semantic dead-ends that --force should not paper
  over (archived = decommissioned, expired = issue a new cert instead of
  renewing a dead one).

  handler.CertificateHandler.TriggerRenewal parses force from
  ?force=true (or ?force=1) query param, OR {"force": true} JSON body,
  whichever the client picks. Defaults to false. Passes through to the
  service.

  internal/cli/client.go::RenewCertificate(id, force bool) sends
  ?force=true on the URL when --force is set. The historical hardcoded
  `{"force": false}` body is gone — no more lying field.

  cmd/cli/main.go dispatches `certs renew <id> [--force]` (ID-first
  flag-second convention matches the existing `agents retire <id>
  [--force]`).

P3-2 — require --reason on `certs revoke` (Option A: strict refusal)

The pre-2026-05-05 CLI dropped to `--reason unspecified` whenever the
operator omitted the flag. Compliance reporting (RFC 5280 §5.3.1, PCI-
DSS §3.6, HIPAA §164.312) relies on the reason code being meaningful;
silent fallback defeats the audit trail because every revocation looks
identical.

  cmd/cli/main.go dispatch refuses to send when --reason is empty,
  prints the canonical RFC 5280 §5.3.1 reason-code menu, and exits
  non-zero.

  internal/cli/client.go exposes ValidRevokeReasons() returning the
  canonical camelCase list (unspecified, keyCompromise, caCompromise,
  affiliationChanged, superseded, cessationOfOperation, certificateHold,
  removeFromCRL, privilegeWithdrawn, aaCompromise) and
  NormalizeRevokeReason() that accepts both camelCase and snake_case
  inputs and normalises to the canonical wire form. Off-list reasons
  are rejected at dispatch with the menu re-printed.

Test pins:

  internal/cli/client_test.go::TestClient_RenewCertificate_ForceFlag —
  --force=true sends ?force=true with empty body; --force=false sends
  no query and no body.

  internal/cli/client_test.go::TestNormalizeRevokeReason +
  TestValidRevokeReasons — canonical-camelCase + snake_case + reject-
  off-enum behaviour.

  cmd/cli/dispatch_test.go::TestHandleCerts_Revoke_RequiresReason +
  TestHandleCerts_Revoke_RejectsUnknownReason +
  TestHandleCerts_Renew_ForceFlag — dispatch-layer pins for the same
  contracts.

  internal/api/handler/certificate_handler_test.go::TestTriggerRenewal_
  ForceQueryParam — query-param passthrough (no-flag, force=true,
  force=1, force=false) flows through to the service-layer parameter.

  internal/service/certificate_test.go::TestTriggerRenewal_
  ForceOverridesInProgress — force=false preserves the
  RenewalInProgress block; force=true clears it.

  Existing TestTriggerRenewal_Archived extended to assert force=true
  still blocks Archived (terminal-state guarantee).

Docs: docs/reference/cli.md updated with the --force example for renew
and the strict --reason semantics for revoke (including snake_case
input acceptance).

Acceptance gate (verified):
  - go build ./cmd/server/... ./cmd/agent/... ./cmd/cli/...
    ./cmd/mcp-server/... clean.
  - go vet ./... clean.
  - go test -short -count=1 ./... pass repo-wide.
  - bash scripts/ci-guards/openapi-handler-parity.sh clean
    (router 178, OpenAPI 144, exceptions 36 — unchanged; we add
    parameter parsing, not routes).
  - gofmt -l clean.
This commit is contained in:
shankar0123
2026-05-05 19:49:34 +00:00
parent ff75361553
commit 0e06f6c4fc
9 changed files with 456 additions and 35 deletions
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ type MockCertificateService struct {
UpdateCertificateFn func(ctx context.Context, id string, cert domain.ManagedCertificate) (*domain.ManagedCertificate, error)
ArchiveCertificateFn func(ctx context.Context, id string) error
GetCertificateVersionsFn func(ctx context.Context, certID string, page, perPage int) ([]domain.CertificateVersion, int64, error)
TriggerRenewalFn func(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string) error
TriggerRenewalFn func(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string, force bool) error
TriggerDeploymentFn func(ctx context.Context, certID string, targetID string, actor string) error
RevokeCertificateFn func(ctx context.Context, certID string, reason string, actor string) error
GetRevokedCertificatesFn func(ctx context.Context) ([]*domain.CertificateRevocation, error)
@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ func (m *MockCertificateService) GetCertificateVersions(ctx context.Context, cer
return nil, 0, nil
}
func (m *MockCertificateService) TriggerRenewal(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string) error {
func (m *MockCertificateService) TriggerRenewal(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string, force bool) error {
if m.TriggerRenewalFn != nil {
return m.TriggerRenewalFn(ctx, certID, actor)
return m.TriggerRenewalFn(ctx, certID, actor, force)
}
return nil
}
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ func TestGetCertificateVersions_NotFound(t *testing.T) {
// Test TriggerRenewal - success case
func TestTriggerRenewal_Success(t *testing.T) {
mock := &MockCertificateService{
TriggerRenewalFn: func(_ context.Context, certID string, _ string) error {
TriggerRenewalFn: func(_ context.Context, certID string, _ string, _ bool) error {
if certID == "mc-prod-001" {
return nil
}
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ func TestTriggerRenewal_Success(t *testing.T) {
// Test TriggerRenewal - service error
func TestTriggerRenewal_ServiceError(t *testing.T) {
mock := &MockCertificateService{
TriggerRenewalFn: func(_ context.Context, certID string, _ string) error {
TriggerRenewalFn: func(_ context.Context, certID string, _ string, _ bool) error {
return ErrMockServiceFailed
},
}
@@ -739,6 +739,44 @@ func TestTriggerRenewal_ServiceError(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// TestTriggerRenewal_ForceQueryParam pins the 2026-05-05 parity-defaults-cleanup
// (P3-1) wire: ?force=true on the renew URL flows through to the service-layer
// `force bool` parameter so operators can override the RenewalInProgress block.
func TestTriggerRenewal_ForceQueryParam(t *testing.T) {
for _, tc := range []struct {
name string
query string
wantForce bool
}{
{"no-flag", "", false},
{"force-true", "?force=true", true},
{"force-1", "?force=1", true},
{"force-false", "?force=false", false},
} {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
var gotForce bool
mock := &MockCertificateService{
TriggerRenewalFn: func(_ context.Context, _ string, _ string, force bool) error {
gotForce = force
return nil
},
}
handler := NewCertificateHandler(mock)
req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodPost,
"/api/v1/certificates/mc-prod-001/renew"+tc.query, nil)
req = req.WithContext(contextWithRequestID())
w := httptest.NewRecorder()
handler.TriggerRenewal(w, req)
if w.Code != http.StatusAccepted {
t.Fatalf("status: got %d want %d", w.Code, http.StatusAccepted)
}
if gotForce != tc.wantForce {
t.Errorf("force passthrough: got %v want %v", gotForce, tc.wantForce)
}
})
}
}
// Test TriggerDeployment - success case
func TestTriggerDeployment_Success(t *testing.T) {
mock := &MockCertificateService{
+20 -2
View File
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ type CertificateService interface {
UpdateCertificate(ctx context.Context, id string, cert domain.ManagedCertificate) (*domain.ManagedCertificate, error)
ArchiveCertificate(ctx context.Context, id string) error
GetCertificateVersions(ctx context.Context, certID string, page, perPage int) ([]domain.CertificateVersion, int64, error)
TriggerRenewal(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string) error
TriggerRenewal(ctx context.Context, certID string, actor string, force bool) error
TriggerDeployment(ctx context.Context, certID string, targetID string, actor string) error
RevokeCertificate(ctx context.Context, certID string, reason string, actor string) error
GetRevokedCertificates(ctx context.Context) ([]*domain.CertificateRevocation, error)
@@ -437,7 +437,25 @@ func (h CertificateHandler) TriggerRenewal(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Reques
actor := resolveActor(r.Context())
if err := h.svc.TriggerRenewal(r.Context(), certID, actor); err != nil {
// 2026-05-05 parity-defaults-cleanup (P3-1): operators can opt into
// forcing a renewal when the cert is stuck in RenewalInProgress (a
// previous job hung without releasing the status flag). Accepted as
// either ?force=true query param OR {"force": true} JSON body so CLI
// + GUI clients can pick whichever flow fits their idiom.
force := false
if fv := r.URL.Query().Get("force"); fv == "true" || fv == "1" {
force = true
}
if !force && r.ContentLength > 0 && r.Header.Get("Content-Type") == "application/json" {
var body struct {
Force bool `json:"force,omitempty"`
}
if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&body); err == nil {
force = body.Force
}
}
if err := h.svc.TriggerRenewal(r.Context(), certID, actor, force); err != nil {
errMsg := err.Error()
if strings.Contains(errMsg, "not found") {
ErrorWithRequestID(w, http.StatusNotFound, "Certificate not found", requestID)