Clint Branham 6e2f25a083 fix: rewrite Claude Code Review workflow to match official examples ...

Previous approach (/code-review:code-review --comment) was based on
incorrect documentation research. Reviewing the actual official
examples at anthropics/claude-code-action/examples/pr-review-*.yml
reveals the correct pattern:

1. Use a custom prompt with explicit review instructions (not a
   plugin slash command)
2. Use claude_args with --allowedTools to enable the MCP inline
   comment tool and gh pr CLI commands — this is what lets Claude
   actually post to the PR
3. Enable track_progress: true for visual progress tracking

Without --allowedTools, Claude has no way to post anything because
the tools for PR commenting aren't allowed by default.

Also removed the plugins and plugin_marketplaces inputs since
they're not needed — the review runs via prompt instructions and
the allowed tools alone.

The custom prompt is tailored to PSProxmoxVE with focus areas
specific to the module: DECISIONS.md compliance, cmdlet
conventions, API correctness against the PVE OpenAPI spec,
test coverage, and security.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-04-13 09:09:54 -05:00

..

ISSUE_TEMPLATE

fix: remediate scan-4 findings F058, F062, F063, F071, F072, F073, F074, F075

2026-03-23 09:54:28 -05:00

workflows

fix: rewrite Claude Code Review workflow to match official examples

2026-04-13 09:09:54 -05:00

copilot-instructions.md

chore: add .github/copilot-instructions.md

2026-03-24 20:38:49 +00:00

dependabot.yml

fix: remediate findings F045, F047, F048, F064, F070, F071, F076-F079

2026-03-23 13:51:37 -05:00

pull_request_template.md

chore: add community files and PSGallery publish workflow

2026-03-20 12:22:13 -05:00